<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Light For London Desalination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://petethehat.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/green-light-for-london-desalination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://petethehat.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/green-light-for-london-desalination/</link>
	<description>information, opinion, conversation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:40:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Get Six Pack Fast</title>
		<link>http://petethehat.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/green-light-for-london-desalination/#comment-2888</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Get Six Pack Fast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentdebate.co.uk/?p=645#comment-2888</guid>
		<description>This is quite a up-to-date info. I&#039;ll share it on Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite a up-to-date info. I&#8217;ll share it on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Smith</title>
		<link>http://petethehat.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/green-light-for-london-desalination/#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentdebate.co.uk/?p=645#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>Hi Clare,
&quot;most things I read used the abbreviation MW to mean megawatt-hour&quot;
That&#039;s a pity, because that&#039;s not correct usage and can only cause confusion. A megawatt-hour is a MWh, and always will be in my book :)
Quite right to be oncerned about the high capital costs of such projects. They do love their big schemes, don&#039;t they? It&#039;s all about control. The bean counters are scared of decentralised initiatives such as domestic water recycling because it&#039;s much harder to measure success and value for money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clare,<br />
&#8220;most things I read used the abbreviation MW to mean megawatt-hour&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s a pity, because that&#8217;s not correct usage and can only cause confusion. A megawatt-hour is a MWh, and always will be in my book <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Quite right to be oncerned about the high capital costs of such projects. They do love their big schemes, don&#8217;t they? It&#8217;s all about control. The bean counters are scared of decentralised initiatives such as domestic water recycling because it&#8217;s much harder to measure success and value for money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClareSnow</title>
		<link>http://petethehat.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/green-light-for-london-desalination/#comment-2583</link>
		<dc:creator>ClareSnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentdebate.co.uk/?p=645#comment-2583</guid>
		<description>The desal plant in Perth seems to have overcome it&#039;s environmental concerns. Although the main &quot;good&quot; thing about it is that it runs on windpower and if the plant wasn&#039;t there, this windpower could be used to replace current coal-generated electricity - governments don&#039;t think of things like that. The tides of the Thames would mix the hypersaline discharge well so that shouldn&#039;t be a problem as it was thought to be in Perth. Used cooking fat and oil can be used as biodiesel -recycling. Although we&#039;d all be better off if the fast food places who crank out the used cooking fat and oil closed down.

The main problem I have with desal plants is the enormous cost of construction. Perth&#039;s 1st cost $A387 million and the 2nd is expected to cost $A1 billion. This money could be better used in recycling water, etc. Sydney is getting in on the action too with a desal plant in the planning stages.

Re: The plant &quot;will use around 6.3MW a year over a 25-year lifespan&quot;
I&#039;ve been reading about electricity generation for a blog post i wrote http://elsewear.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/cheap-coal/ and most things I read used the abbreviation MW to mean megawatt-hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The desal plant in Perth seems to have overcome it&#8217;s environmental concerns. Although the main &#8220;good&#8221; thing about it is that it runs on windpower and if the plant wasn&#8217;t there, this windpower could be used to replace current coal-generated electricity &#8211; governments don&#8217;t think of things like that. The tides of the Thames would mix the hypersaline discharge well so that shouldn&#8217;t be a problem as it was thought to be in Perth. Used cooking fat and oil can be used as biodiesel -recycling. Although we&#8217;d all be better off if the fast food places who crank out the used cooking fat and oil closed down.</p>
<p>The main problem I have with desal plants is the enormous cost of construction. Perth&#8217;s 1st cost $A387 million and the 2nd is expected to cost $A1 billion. This money could be better used in recycling water, etc. Sydney is getting in on the action too with a desal plant in the planning stages.</p>
<p>Re: The plant &#8220;will use around 6.3MW a year over a 25-year lifespan&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;ve been reading about electricity generation for a blog post i wrote <a href="http://elsewear.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/cheap-coal/" rel="nofollow">http://elsewear.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/cheap-coal/</a> and most things I read used the abbreviation MW to mean megawatt-hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://petethehat.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/green-light-for-london-desalination/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentdebate.co.uk/?p=645#comment-2582</guid>
		<description>Clare (Perth, WA) writes about her city&#039;s new desalination plant;

http://elsewear.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/desalination3/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clare (Perth, WA) writes about her city&#8217;s new desalination plant;</p>
<p><a href="http://elsewear.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/desalination3/" rel="nofollow">http://elsewear.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/desalination3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://petethehat.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/green-light-for-london-desalination/#comment-2581</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentdebate.co.uk/?p=645#comment-2581</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. &#039;Renewable&#039; indeed. Perhaps Thames Water could buy Shell&#039;s share of the London Array.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. &#8216;Renewable&#8217; indeed. Perhaps Thames Water could buy Shell&#8217;s share of the London Array.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
